I think it’s interesting to look at Book of Mormon narrators as
real people, as characters in their own stories with their own personalities,
styles, and reasons for writing what they did.
Sometimes we make the mistake of assuming they are omniscient and
unbiased historians, and we forget that there’s a story behind the story they’re
telling—there are details they’re leaving out, there are perspectives of which
they are not aware. Far from
discrediting their writings, this approach takes the authors seriously, as it
assumes, first and foremost, that they are real people. Omniscient, unbiased narrators belong in the
realm of fiction, and the Book of Mormon is anything but. Book of Mormon authors, just like normal
people, have their own biases and experiences that color the way they write.
For instance, whenever a Sunday School class gets to the war
chapters of the Book of Mormon, we’ll often have a discussion about why so many
war chapters are included. Common
answers include the idea that we’re engaged in latter-day warfare, or that we
should expect physical and/or spiritual war before the Second Coming, etc. Often overlooked is the simpler answer: there
are a lot of accounts of war in the Book of Mormon because Mormon, who was
abridging and editing the history, was a soldier and a general—Mormon knew war
really well. He had seen war all his
days, and so when he went back to the historical record, he found the accounts
of battles particularly gripping. We see
the way he treats the account of Captain Moroni, almost falling all over
himself to lionize him, excuse his actions, and hold him up as a standard for
others to follow. He even named his son
after the man. As you read, you can
almost see Mormon, with the wreckage of his wicked, embattled people all around
him, with the death toll mounting daily, daydreaming in the library as he pores
over the records of an earlier time—the last time when his people, the
Nephites, were righteous and victorious in battle. As he envisions what life could have been
like if there had been a few more men like this Captain Moroni he’s read so
much about, he writes, “if all men had been, and were, and ever would be, like
unto Moroni, behold, the very powers of hell would have been shaken forever;
yea, the devil would never have power over the hearts of the children of men”
(Alma 48:17).
Every story has context. Sometimes
we have to read between the lines to see it.
I’ve been working on that this year, and I’ve been amazed at how my
perspective of the Book of Mormon stories has changed.
Nephi is another interesting character to look at. We hold him up in children’s songs as a
paragon of virtue, the ultimate Mr. “I-will-go-I-will-do.” But I’ve often thought he came off a little
rude to his brothers, and had some sympathy for them—after all, he was always
running around quoting scripture at them, telling them off for their
unfaithfulness, and haughtily interpreting prophecy. If I had a snot-nosed little brother doing
that all the time, I’d probably want to tie him to the mast, too. I’m not saying he wasn’t in the right—just that
maybe he could have used a few more people skills.
While his family is in the wilderness, the family patriarch (and
Nephi’s father-in-law) dies, and Nephi
records his death and his daughters' words of sorrow: "And it came to pass
that the daughters of Ishmael did mourn exceedingly, because of the loss of
their father, and because of their afflictions in the wilderness; and they did
murmur against my father, because he had brought them out of the land of
Jerusalem, saying: Our father is dead; yea, and we have wandered much in the
wilderness, and we have suffered much affliction, hunger, thirst, and fatigue;
and after all these sufferings we must perish in the wilderness with
hunger" (1 Nephi 16:35).
It's interesting to me that Nephi frames this encounter quite
negatively. The girls have been uprooted from their home, lost their
father, and they list their afflictions, but Nephi dismisses their concerns as
"murmuring against" Lehi. He sees the women's trials so much
differently: "And it came to pass that we did again take our journey in
the wilderness; and we did travel nearly eastward from that time forth. And we
did travel and wade through much affliction in the wilderness; and our women
did bear children in the wilderness. And so great were the blessings of the
Lord upon us, that while we did live upon raw meat in the wilderness, our women
did give plenty of suck for their children, and were strong, yea, even like
unto the men; and they began to bear their journeyings without murmurings"
(1 Ne. 17:1-2).
Nephi's brothers, who we label wicked and contentious, saw their
wives' suffering differently, "we have wandered in the wilderness for
these many years,” they said, “and our women have toiled, being big with child;
and they have borne children in the wilderness and suffered all things, save it
were death; and it would have been better that they had died before they came
out of Jerusalem than to have suffered these afflictions." (1 Ne
17:20). It occurs to me that perhaps Nephi was the one in the wrong here:
perhaps he was guilty of a lack of empathy. Perhaps his over-zealousness
to inherit the promised land led him to ignore the very real suffering of his
wife and his sisters-in-law, who bore children in the wilderness without the
benefits of ultrasounds and infant formula. Maybe it appeared to Nephi
that the women “began to bear their journeyings without murmurings” because
they got tired of talking to someone who refused to listen and reprimanded them
for their unfaithfulness when their backs got tired of carrying their children
across the desert.
I find it interesting that Nephi records three responses to the
same women's suffering: his own, his brothers', and their wives'. And yet
it doesn't occur to him that one of these things is not like the others.
Many years later, Nephi's brother Jacob chastised his people for their callous
behavior toward their wives, and commended the Lamanite men for the care and
love they showed theirs, "Behold, the Lamanites your brethren, whom ye
hate because of their filthiness and the cursing which hath come upon their
skins, are more righteous than you; for they have not forgotten the
commandment of the Lord, which was given unto our father—that they should have
save it were one wife, and concubines they should have
none…Behold, their husbands love their wives, and their
wives love their husbands; and their husbands and their wives love their
children; and their unbelief and their hatred towards you is because
of the iniquity of their fathers; wherefore, how much better are you than they,
in the sight of your great Creator?" (Jacob 3:5-7)
I wonder if it's too much of a stretch to say that the dynamic
manifested there was already emerging as the family was crossing the
desert. I'm not saying, of course, that Nephi was guilty of
concubinage--or that Laman and Lemuel were great guys I'd want to go on a
road-trip with. Just that perhaps they were better than Nephi in this, at
least--they listened to their wives. They took their concerns seriously.
They defended their wives and stood up for their needs. And it hurt them to see
their wives go through so much pain.
I've been amazed since I got married at how loving and good
Chandler is to me. It has been hard for me to adjust to all the changes that
have taken place in the past few months, and a few weeks ago all the stress and
pressure boiled over again and I was crying and heartsick. But when I
looked in Chandler's eyes and saw how heartbroken he was to see me so sad, how
willing he was to do anything at all to make me happy, I was filled with so
much love for him, so much gratitude that I'd been given this good man who
truly loved me, more fully and deeply than I knew or deserved. He's the
kind of man who would stick up for me when I was most vulnerable, who would say,
"Screw you, Nephi, we're not leaving this campsite until my wife recovers,
and I don't care how good you think raw meat is for nursing women or how much
you think we'll be blessed for getting back on the camels *this
instant*!" (Actually, he's far more diplomatic than that, so he'd
probably find a nice way to say that, but still, he's got my back.) And
then he would come stroke my hair and rub my feet and hold me as I sobbed
incoherently, and most importantly, he'd listen to me and validate my concerns
and mingle his tears with mine and help me know that really, everything would
be okay. I know it sounds like some odd combination of cheesiness and
blasphemy to thank God for a husband who complains like Nephi and loves like Laman
and Lemuel, but, well, there it is.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is why I love the Book of
Mormon. It’s an endless source of
fascination to me—especially when I look for the story behind the words on the
page.

This may actually be the best thing I have ever read. Ever.
ReplyDeleteI think Nephi's a little goody two shoes as well. Also, I hate that part in Moses where Adam is all "but! that woman told me to eaaat so it's HER faaaaault." WHAT. MAN UP, GOOD SIR.
ahem.
I don't know if you've heard John Bytheway's talk on the war chapters of the Book of Mormon but I really enjoyed listening to it. Have no idea what it's called but it was good. So, um, there's that.
This is an objective opinion that distinguishes the difference between church culture and doctrine.
ReplyDelete